<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiburon Screenshot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: khelifa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-20001</link>
		<dc:creator>khelifa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-20001</guid>
		<description>it wil be great adition if it suport righttoleft mode</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it wil be great adition if it suport righttoleft mode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VSE user</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19921</link>
		<dc:creator>VSE user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19921</guid>
		<description>And what about Turbo Explorer 2009?
And without "One personality limitation" and "no 3rd party components".

Microsoft's VS Express has much more possibilities and no limitations for developers in functionality!

Reports can be used free:
http://www.gotreportviewer.com/

For 75% single developers VSE is enough. They can free use 3rd party libraries:

1) Creating reports (MS Reporting Services + http://www.fyireporting.com/products.html)
2) Creating OpenXML files (Open XML Format SDK)
3) Working with OpenOffice with Intellisense.
4) Creating charts:
http://zedgraph.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about Turbo Explorer 2009?<br />
And without "One personality limitation" and "no 3rd party components".</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s VS Express has much more possibilities and no limitations for developers in functionality!</p>
<p>Reports can be used free:<br />
<a href="http://www.gotreportviewer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gotreportviewer.com/</a></p>
<p>For 75% single developers VSE is enough. They can free use 3rd party libraries:</p>
<p>1) Creating reports (MS Reporting Services + <a href="http://www.fyireporting.com/products.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fyireporting.com/products.html</a>)<br />
2) Creating OpenXML files (Open XML Format SDK)<br />
3) Working with OpenOffice with Intellisense.<br />
4) Creating charts:<br />
<a href="http://zedgraph.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://zedgraph.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammed Nasman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19920</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammed Nasman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19920</guid>
		<description>Nick,

  Does the Ribbon support BidiMore = RightToLeft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>  Does the Ribbon support BidiMore = RightToLeft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brion L. Webster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19913</link>
		<dc:creator>Brion L. Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19913</guid>
		<description>Jonnes/Joao!  Yes, I'm still around.  Not quite sure why sometimes, but just can't seem to let myself go! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonnes/Joao!  Yes, I&#8217;m still around.  Not quite sure why sometimes, but just can&#8217;t seem to let myself go! <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m. Th.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19912</link>
		<dc:creator>m. Th.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19912</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick, 

Nice to see it.

1. In MSWord/Excel 2007 by double-clicking on a tab (eg. 'Home') the ribbon collapses (it enters, in fact, in auto-hide mode). After this, by (single) clicking on a tab it shows the corresponding page and after choosing a button/action the ribbon auto-hides itself again. By double-clicking again on a tab one can restore the ribbon's initial state. Do you provide such a mode and/or corresponding events to achieve it?

2. About 'skining': One can skin _only_ the ribbon or the entire form?

3. Do you provide an UI for end user customisation?

4. If the response for 3. is 'yes', it supports also shortcut keys customisation? (for ex. a THotKey component to assign certain key combination to the current action or something similar)

TIA,

m. Th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick, </p>
<p>Nice to see it.</p>
<p>1. In MSWord/Excel 2007 by double-clicking on a tab (eg. &#8216;Home&#8217;) the ribbon collapses (it enters, in fact, in auto-hide mode). After this, by (single) clicking on a tab it shows the corresponding page and after choosing a button/action the ribbon auto-hides itself again. By double-clicking again on a tab one can restore the ribbon&#8217;s initial state. Do you provide such a mode and/or corresponding events to achieve it?</p>
<p>2. About &#8217;skining&#8217;: One can skin _only_ the ribbon or the entire form?</p>
<p>3. Do you provide an UI for end user customisation?</p>
<p>4. If the response for 3. is &#8216;yes&#8217;, it supports also shortcut keys customisation? (for ex. a THotKey component to assign certain key combination to the current action or something similar)</p>
<p>TIA,</p>
<p>m. Th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joao Henrique Levada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19911</link>
		<dc:creator>Joao Henrique Levada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19911</guid>
		<description>Brion, is that you?!

From the old "Kylix-Borland Chat" times?

I'm Jonnes, remember me?

If you do so, send me a mail on joaolevada at gmail dot com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brion, is that you?!</p>
<p>From the old "Kylix-Borland Chat" times?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m Jonnes, remember me?</p>
<p>If you do so, send me a mail on joaolevada at gmail dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19909</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19909</guid>
		<description>BTW --

The reason that the ListView isn't themed is because I screwed up -- I'm going to redo the screenshot.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211;</p>
<p>The reason that the ListView isn&#8217;t themed is because I screwed up &#8212; I&#8217;m going to redo the screenshot.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19908</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19908</guid>
		<description>Ottar --

Yes, you can skin it. I believe that we are shipping with three different skins.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ottar &#8211;</p>
<p>Yes, you can skin it. I believe that we are shipping with three different skins.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19907</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19907</guid>
		<description>Zenon --

The helmet icon is based on a very real Trojan Helmet found, if I am not mistaken, in the Hellenic National Museum in Greece.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zenon &#8211;</p>
<p>The helmet icon is based on a very real Trojan Helmet found, if I am not mistaken, in the Hellenic National Museum in Greece.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19905</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19905</guid>
		<description>Roland --

What message bug in the build tab?

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland &#8211;</p>
<p>What message bug in the build tab?</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brion L. Webster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator>Brion L. Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19904</guid>
		<description>Nick, you posted on the NNTP newsgroup borland.public.delphi.non-technical that there will not be a CodeGear RAD Studio product in the Tiburon timeframe.  Is this screenshot correct, then?  The IDE title says CodeGear RAD Studio, which could reasonably lead previous RAD Studio Software Assurance holders to expect a .NET personality.

-Brion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, you posted on the NNTP newsgroup borland.public.delphi.non-technical that there will not be a CodeGear RAD Studio product in the Tiburon timeframe.  Is this screenshot correct, then?  The IDE title says CodeGear RAD Studio, which could reasonably lead previous RAD Studio Software Assurance holders to expect a .NET personality.</p>
<p>-Brion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19903</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19903</guid>
		<description>Zenon,

It's not a medieval knight's helmet.  It's a Greco-Roman era helmet.  Seeing that Delphi was the ancient Greek location of an oracle, the icon makes sense.  Still I would like to see a new icon this round.  At one time, I had both D2006 and D2007 in my Quickstart bar.  I had to hover just to find out which of the quick start was which.  I eventually changed the icon of D2006 in the menu, but there needs to be a new icon for the new studio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zenon,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a medieval knight&#8217;s helmet.  It&#8217;s a Greco-Roman era helmet.  Seeing that Delphi was the ancient Greek location of an oracle, the icon makes sense.  Still I would like to see a new icon this round.  At one time, I had both D2006 and D2007 in my Quickstart bar.  I had to hover just to find out which of the quick start was which.  I eventually changed the icon of D2006 in the menu, but there needs to be a new icon for the new studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19902</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19902</guid>
		<description>I suggest this icon to replace the helmet: http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/jaws.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest this icon to replace the helmet: <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/jaws.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/jaws.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19901</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19901</guid>
		<description>Liking the new components a lot and looking forward to unicode as we use a lot of mathematical (greek) symbols.

Hope you guys are currently debugging your little asses off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liking the new components a lot and looking forward to unicode as we use a lot of mathematical (greek) symbols.</p>
<p>Hope you guys are currently debugging your little asses off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manolis Perrakis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19900</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolis Perrakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19900</guid>
		<description>In order Codegear to be able to attract new customers it must have allies.
It must also provide some innovation something new in technology areas in order 
to persuade third party companies to invest in these technologies.
In my opinion Codegear doesnot create allies. 
I'm a VCL subscriber in DevExpress for many years and I'm watching the distance separating net
and Vcl tools to become bigger and bigger in favor of Microsoft Tools.
Can anyone really compare the quality and the support of DevExpress tools with anything?
They support previous versions products and give you patches and corrections for them nearly any month. These are really professionals. Visit their site and see the dozen of videos they create promoting Microsoft Tools. Any video for VCL? Not a chance..
I also see Microsoft's third party parteners to produce their own technologies supporting net platforms. DevExpress for example introduces XPO and XAF, Remobjects has Oxygene and telerik creates its own WPF technology for Winforms .. 
I also think that with the buyout from Embarcadero Codegear will also compete and shrink RemObjects DA.
Therefore in my opinion with these moves the VCL third party market will continue to shrink 
Maybe some of you may think that it won't affect Codegear, but I would have to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order Codegear to be able to attract new customers it must have allies.<br />
It must also provide some innovation something new in technology areas in order<br />
to persuade third party companies to invest in these technologies.<br />
In my opinion Codegear doesnot create allies.<br />
I&#8217;m a VCL subscriber in DevExpress for many years and I&#8217;m watching the distance separating net<br />
and Vcl tools to become bigger and bigger in favor of Microsoft Tools.<br />
Can anyone really compare the quality and the support of DevExpress tools with anything?<br />
They support previous versions products and give you patches and corrections for them nearly any month. These are really professionals. Visit their site and see the dozen of videos they create promoting Microsoft Tools. Any video for VCL? Not a chance..<br />
I also see Microsoft&#8217;s third party parteners to produce their own technologies supporting net platforms. DevExpress for example introduces XPO and XAF, Remobjects has Oxygene and telerik creates its own WPF technology for Winforms ..<br />
I also think that with the buyout from Embarcadero Codegear will also compete and shrink RemObjects DA.<br />
Therefore in my opinion with these moves the VCL third party market will continue to shrink<br />
Maybe some of you may think that it won&#8217;t affect Codegear, but I would have to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen Pluimers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen Pluimers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19899</guid>
		<description>Good to see the "Exit" icon is still old skool ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the "Exit" icon is still old skool <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Frazier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19898</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Frazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19898</guid>
		<description>I don't care what kind of beta state it's in...  just send me a copy.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what kind of beta state it&#8217;s in&#8230;  just send me a copy.</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19897</link>
		<dc:creator>asp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19897</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Manolis. I like the MS products because they include all neccessary tools whithin the package. See SQL Server, VS. Why I need to spend extra money to by a lot of third party components to achieve just a modern look. I like to get all in the box. It is not about extra features that could be done by third parties. But the basic thinks like modern look and feel must be supplied by CodeGear. And it is very good that CodeGear updates VCL, first time for the years. What I personally wish, it is to update docking. Existing applications using built-in docking mechanism looks ugly on XP with themes enabled and nearly unusable on Vista. Why not to publish docking panels used by IDE? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Manolis. I like the MS products because they include all neccessary tools whithin the package. See SQL Server, VS. Why I need to spend extra money to by a lot of third party components to achieve just a modern look. I like to get all in the box. It is not about extra features that could be done by third parties. But the basic thinks like modern look and feel must be supplied by CodeGear. And it is very good that CodeGear updates VCL, first time for the years. What I personally wish, it is to update docking. Existing applications using built-in docking mechanism looks ugly on XP with themes enabled and nearly unusable on Vista. Why not to publish docking panels used by IDE? <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bvo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19896</link>
		<dc:creator>Bvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19896</guid>
		<description>Manolis Perrakis-

Who needs these baggy and heavy components from DevExpress or TMS?
I don't like DE' and don't need TMS' so much.
It's great to see TRibbon comes - after upgrading to D2009 it will be easy (I hope) update an interface of existing applications to introduce a new level of accessibility without additional costs.
As for me TRibbon is the only thing I like in D2009.

And third-party comp. developers HAVE to go far ahead of CG' comps. Just look at VS - great IDE with many ready2use comps, not like Delphi with it's TButtonEdit, TLinkLabel and others things, which should be presented 10 years ago. And VS 3rd-party market is huge.

Though it's a pity that TurboPower is not here today...
But it's other things why them gone - Delphi sucks for many years.

Will it rise again? Wee'll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manolis Perrakis-</p>
<p>Who needs these baggy and heavy components from DevExpress or TMS?<br />
I don&#8217;t like DE&#8217; and don&#8217;t need TMS&#8217; so much.<br />
It&#8217;s great to see TRibbon comes - after upgrading to D2009 it will be easy (I hope) update an interface of existing applications to introduce a new level of accessibility without additional costs.<br />
As for me TRibbon is the only thing I like in D2009.</p>
<p>And third-party comp. developers HAVE to go far ahead of CG&#8217; comps. Just look at VS - great IDE with many ready2use comps, not like Delphi with it&#8217;s TButtonEdit, TLinkLabel and others things, which should be presented 10 years ago. And VS 3rd-party market is huge.</p>
<p>Though it&#8217;s a pity that TurboPower is not here today&#8230;<br />
But it&#8217;s other things why them gone - Delphi sucks for many years.</p>
<p>Will it rise again? Wee&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ottar Holstad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19895</link>
		<dc:creator>Ottar Holstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19895</guid>
		<description>Do we get skinning to go with the ribbon? I think that would be more important than the ribbon itself. As it is, every component-vendor invents its own skinning mechanisms, making it hard to combine GUI-components from different vendors (incl. the standard windows controls). Anyway, I think it's in there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we get skinning to go with the ribbon? I think that would be more important than the ribbon itself. As it is, every component-vendor invents its own skinning mechanisms, making it hard to combine GUI-components from different vendors (incl. the standard windows controls). Anyway, I think it&#8217;s in there <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19894</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19894</guid>
		<description>Yes, **please** get rid of the helmet icon!!!! Or at least, someone please explain to me how on earth a medieval knight's helmet makes any sense in connection with a 21st-century Rapid Application Development environment, just so that I can sleep peacefully..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, **please** get rid of the helmet icon!!!! Or at least, someone please explain to me how on earth a medieval knight&#8217;s helmet makes any sense in connection with a 21st-century Rapid Application Development environment, just so that I can sleep peacefully..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19893</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19893</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Manolis,
Delphi needs to be owner of a powerfull GUI. This is very important to attract new users.

Delphi 2009 looks great!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Manolis,<br />
Delphi needs to be owner of a powerfull GUI. This is very important to attract new users.</p>
<p>Delphi 2009 looks great!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chee Meng</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19892</link>
		<dc:creator>Chee Meng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19892</guid>
		<description>I concur with Manolis.

It will be sad to see more component creators moving away to other platforms or closing shop altogether (TurboPower, anyone?).

Unless the component-makers are not doing their job well, it might have been a better idea to get a bulk license from them to include their component as part of new comp. set. Heck, that might even stir the emergence of new component-makers!

Nevertheless, congrats on the new (upcoming) launch! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Manolis.</p>
<p>It will be sad to see more component creators moving away to other platforms or closing shop altogether (TurboPower, anyone?).</p>
<p>Unless the component-makers are not doing their job well, it might have been a better idea to get a bulk license from them to include their component as part of new comp. set. Heck, that might even stir the emergence of new component-makers!</p>
<p>Nevertheless, congrats on the new (upcoming) launch! <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manolis Perrakis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19891</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolis Perrakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19891</guid>
		<description>I don't think Ribbon creating a Ribbon is a good idea.
1. You spend resources on something that already exists by 2 vendors
   (devexpress and tms) for nearly 2 years
2. You are removing financial resources from the third party developers even though
   there are so few left in the VCL market. This is another reason for 
   the shrinking of this market.  
3. It is obvious that you have nothing pioneer and new to show and you only copy 
   what already has been done. (Ribbon controls, Net and so on).

Congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Ribbon creating a Ribbon is a good idea.<br />
1. You spend resources on something that already exists by 2 vendors<br />
   (devexpress and tms) for nearly 2 years<br />
2. You are removing financial resources from the third party developers even though<br />
   there are so few left in the VCL market. This is another reason for<br />
   the shrinking of this market.<br />
3. It is obvious that you have nothing pioneer and new to show and you only copy<br />
   what already has been done. (Ribbon controls, Net and so on).</p>
<p>Congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19890</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19890</guid>
		<description>Great Ribbon is here :)

Like Luigi i'm asking me if the new ribbon's components have 'interaction' with all other vcl components plugged in forms...
for example, the statusbar component must be specific when ribbon menu are used in forms.. PopupMenu, PopupActionMenu too etc...
All of this for ergonomic and graphics design homogeneity ...

I think choice between design form plugged in ide windows (need scrolling...) or like design form like a real free windows (like in delphi 7) should be very nice...

Thanks Nick for all your D2009 posts, informations are good...

nb: sorry for me poor english...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Ribbon is here <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Like Luigi i&#8217;m asking me if the new ribbon&#8217;s components have &#8216;interaction&#8217; with all other vcl components plugged in forms&#8230;<br />
for example, the statusbar component must be specific when ribbon menu are used in forms.. PopupMenu, PopupActionMenu too etc&#8230;<br />
All of this for ergonomic and graphics design homogeneity &#8230;</p>
<p>I think choice between design form plugged in ide windows (need scrolling&#8230;) or like design form like a real free windows (like in delphi 7) should be very nice&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks Nick for all your D2009 posts, informations are good&#8230;</p>
<p>nb: sorry for me poor english&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luigi D. Sandon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19888</link>
		<dc:creator>Luigi D. Sandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19888</guid>
		<description>Why the listview (or whatever it is) on the left is not themed/skinned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the listview (or whatever it is) on the left is not themed/skinned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irakliation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19887</link>
		<dc:creator>Irakliation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19887</guid>
		<description>Stevie -

+1

Visually upgraded IDE would be nice with brand new icon. Also Action Menus might need renewal ;) What about data binding model and data controls? Are there any improvements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stevie -</p>
<p>+1</p>
<p>Visually upgraded IDE would be nice with brand new icon. Also Action Menus might need renewal <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> What about data binding model and data controls? Are there any improvements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19885</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19885</guid>
		<description>Well actually it means "歡迎來到 Delphi 2009 帶來的 Unicode 世界".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well actually it means "歡迎來到 Delphi 2009 帶來的 Unicode 世界".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19884</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19884</guid>
		<description>The new version looks really good!
Have you fixed the message bug in the build tab yet ?
For reference see http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=44678

/Roland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new version looks really good!<br />
Have you fixed the message bug in the build tab yet ?<br />
For reference see <a href="http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=44678" rel="nofollow">http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=44678</a></p>
<p>/Roland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YFY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19883</link>
		<dc:creator>YFY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/07/24/39083#comment-19883</guid>
		<description>The sentence which is in Chinese that has been translated from Englishe is WRONG! The correct one is:

Chinese: 欢迎来到 Delphi2009 的 Unicode 世界！
Englishe: Welcome to the world of Unicode with Delphi 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentence which is in Chinese that has been translated from Englishe is WRONG! The correct one is:</p>
<p>Chinese: 欢迎来到 Delphi2009 的 Unicode 世界！<br />
Englishe: Welcome to the world of Unicode with Delphi 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
