<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Totally Juiced Up!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19654</link>
		<author>Nick Hodges</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19654</guid>
		<description>Roman --

"Second half of 2008" is the best I can do.  I can't be more specific than that.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roman &#8211;</p>
<p>"Second half of 2008" is the best I can do.  I can&#8217;t be more specific than that.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Vasin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19653</link>
		<author>Roman Vasin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19653</guid>
		<description>Nick. Thank you for the link about the roadmap. I was searching for it a couple of days ago but I could not locate it by myself. 

Sorry for insisting with this offtopic, but do you have any more concrete time term: is it going be middle or end of 2008? Or maybe you may give a moth: September, November etc? I know that you may always change the release date. But what is the current estimation of the release date? In which month will it be released? We have a lot of customers asking us for Unicode support since a long time. So we are in a middle of the road right now: should we use third-party Unicode controls right now or should be wait until CodeGear releases Delphi 2008. With fist case we will have to do a double work: the fist we will integrate thirdparty Unicode controls, then after release of D2008 we should remove the controls and integrate native VCL controls. I always prefer to use native (original) VCL controls instead of thirdparty controls whenever it's possible. So I am waiting now for release of D2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick. Thank you for the link about the roadmap. I was searching for it a couple of days ago but I could not locate it by myself. </p>
<p>Sorry for insisting with this offtopic, but do you have any more concrete time term: is it going be middle or end of 2008? Or maybe you may give a moth: September, November etc? I know that you may always change the release date. But what is the current estimation of the release date? In which month will it be released? We have a lot of customers asking us for Unicode support since a long time. So we are in a middle of the road right now: should we use third-party Unicode controls right now or should be wait until CodeGear releases Delphi 2008. With fist case we will have to do a double work: the fist we will integrate thirdparty Unicode controls, then after release of D2008 we should remove the controls and integrate native VCL controls. I always prefer to use native (original) VCL controls instead of thirdparty controls whenever it&#8217;s possible. So I am waiting now for release of D2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19652</link>
		<author>Nick Hodges</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19652</guid>
		<description>Roman --

The next version of Delphi is due in the second half of 2008.

You can read our roadmap at:

http://dn.codegear.com/article/36620

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roman &#8211;</p>
<p>The next version of Delphi is due in the second half of 2008.</p>
<p>You can read our roadmap at:</p>
<p><a href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/36620" rel="nofollow">http://dn.codegear.com/article/36620</a></p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Vasin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19650</link>
		<author>Roman Vasin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19650</guid>
		<description>Nick, I asked probably 3 times in forums and other places. But when Delphi 2008 will be finally released. Will it support fully Unicode (VCL, database layer and others) as it was promised. I hope this purchase of CodeGear by Embarcadero will not shift Delphi 2008 release date. Do you have any information about planned release date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I asked probably 3 times in forums and other places. But when Delphi 2008 will be finally released. Will it support fully Unicode (VCL, database layer and others) as it was promised. I hope this purchase of CodeGear by Embarcadero will not shift Delphi 2008 release date. Do you have any information about planned release date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisnu Widiarta</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19649</link>
		<author>Wisnu Widiarta</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19649</guid>
		<description>The first response I read this entry is NOW WHAT?
*Sigh*

Whatever happen to Delphi, I will use it as long as possible. But I keep learning new technologies like C# and Java. I think it is not wise just depending on one super tool / language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first response I read this entry is NOW WHAT?<br />
*Sigh*</p>
<p>Whatever happen to Delphi, I will use it as long as possible. But I keep learning new technologies like C# and Java. I think it is not wise just depending on one super tool / language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19644</link>
		<author>Steve Taylor</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19644</guid>
		<description>Your enthusiasm gives me confidence. I work for a small company and have converted three small companies from Microsoft shops to Delphi shops through the demonstrable strength of the Delphi product over the negativity and marketing hype from the evil empire. 

As someone who has been a huge supporter since Turbo Pascal v1 days I wish you guys the best of luck and hope that you keep standing up for the interests of long time users who have a considerable investment of time, money, and credibility in your products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your enthusiasm gives me confidence. I work for a small company and have converted three small companies from Microsoft shops to Delphi shops through the demonstrable strength of the Delphi product over the negativity and marketing hype from the evil empire. </p>
<p>As someone who has been a huge supporter since Turbo Pascal v1 days I wish you guys the best of luck and hope that you keep standing up for the interests of long time users who have a considerable investment of time, money, and credibility in your products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nenad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19638</link>
		<author>Nenad</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19638</guid>
		<description>&#62;Don’t worry: ISV’s are a critical and important part of our customer base

Great!

"fix" QC#21729 and prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Don’t worry: ISV’s are a critical and important part of our customer base</p>
<p>Great!</p>
<p>"fix" QC#21729 and prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jachguate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19635</link>
		<author>jachguate</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19635</guid>
		<description>@Mark:

Now, you can use the Mozilla Firefox ActiveX control.  Read how at http://www.paranoia.clara.net/articles/taming_the_lizard_with_delphi.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark:</p>
<p>Now, you can use the Mozilla Firefox ActiveX control.  Read how at <a href="http://www.paranoia.clara.net/articles/taming_the_lizard_with_delphi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paranoia.clara.net/articles/taming_the_lizard_with_delphi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19634</link>
		<author>Mark G</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19634</guid>
		<description>I'm fan of Delphi since the 1.0 version. I truly hope this can help take it to the next level. Here is a list of some things I would love to see in future Delphi releases:

- Cross-compiling (Windows/Mac OS X/Ubuntu, etc)
- Enhanced speed and stability
- 64-bit compiler
- Native XML parsing
- Alternative HTML engine components (Mozilla/Safari)

Good luck guys! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fan of Delphi since the 1.0 version. I truly hope this can help take it to the next level. Here is a list of some things I would love to see in future Delphi releases:</p>
<p>- Cross-compiling (Windows/Mac OS X/Ubuntu, etc)<br />
- Enhanced speed and stability<br />
- 64-bit compiler<br />
- Native XML parsing<br />
- Alternative HTML engine components (Mozilla/Safari)</p>
<p>Good luck guys! <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitaliy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19633</link>
		<author>Vitaliy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19633</guid>
		<description>Interesting thing is that this development company don't know anything about relations with developers. One time we were just informad about spinoff, now about final buyout. And no one understands that each of this silly moves results in new dubts in your user base.
As for Embarcadero - it is one of the worst that I can imagine. 
As it solves no real Codegear problems.
First problem. Inability to focus on key products. Leave Delphi and C++ Builder. Forget this PHP, Eclipse and Ruby games.
Second problem. Delphi is not database development tool by nature, it unfortunately become one. Database development tools are niche products and this is very populated niche :-)

And I don't like ERStudio, really hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thing is that this development company don&#8217;t know anything about relations with developers. One time we were just informad about spinoff, now about final buyout. And no one understands that each of this silly moves results in new dubts in your user base.<br />
As for Embarcadero - it is one of the worst that I can imagine.<br />
As it solves no real Codegear problems.<br />
First problem. Inability to focus on key products. Leave Delphi and C++ Builder. Forget this PHP, Eclipse and Ruby games.<br />
Second problem. Delphi is not database development tool by nature, it unfortunately become one. Database development tools are niche products and this is very populated niche <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t like ERStudio, really hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19632</link>
		<author>Nick Hodges</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19632</guid>
		<description>Dan --

Don't worry: ISV's are a critical and important part of our customer base.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry: ISV&#8217;s are a critical and important part of our customer base.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fields</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19631</link>
		<author>Dan Fields</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19631</guid>
		<description>This is excellent news!  It is an acceptable alternative to my drean of Phillipe Khan returning to save the day.

May Borland die an even slower death trying to feed itself on ALM.  What a joke!  No one is making any money in that space.  It has been plagued by empty promises and acquired technology.

I can defintely see the fit with Embarcadero Technologies.  Please do not loose focus on ISVs!!!  We have no other tool.  We do not even exist in Microsoft's eyes.

I have been defending this platform since Turbo Pascal 1.0.  I stuck with this tool because it has never failed me.

Ii think you should move cross-platform development higher up on the roadmap.  Having a real develpoment tool for the Mac platform would give you a huge lead over all other development companies.

Good luck to you guys, and please give us more information as soon as you are free to speak about the ugly situation you are leavings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent news!  It is an acceptable alternative to my drean of Phillipe Khan returning to save the day.</p>
<p>May Borland die an even slower death trying to feed itself on ALM.  What a joke!  No one is making any money in that space.  It has been plagued by empty promises and acquired technology.</p>
<p>I can defintely see the fit with Embarcadero Technologies.  Please do not loose focus on ISVs!!!  We have no other tool.  We do not even exist in Microsoft&#8217;s eyes.</p>
<p>I have been defending this platform since Turbo Pascal 1.0.  I stuck with this tool because it has never failed me.</p>
<p>Ii think you should move cross-platform development higher up on the roadmap.  Having a real develpoment tool for the Mac platform would give you a huge lead over all other development companies.</p>
<p>Good luck to you guys, and please give us more information as soon as you are free to speak about the ugly situation you are leavings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19630</link>
		<author>mikeb</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19630</guid>
		<description>@DerekSmith:

The disclaimer at the end of the press release is simply legal boilerplate that pretty much any press release from a public company requires - it's basically saying, "regardless of what we say in this PR, the stock price might still go down".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DerekSmith:</p>
<p>The disclaimer at the end of the press release is simply legal boilerplate that pretty much any press release from a public company requires - it&#8217;s basically saying, "regardless of what we say in this PR, the stock price might still go down".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerekSmith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19629</link>
		<author>DerekSmith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19629</guid>
		<description>Oh Dear !!

All those glowing words, but just what IS the King wearing?

And at the end of the statement, something which looks alarmingly like - 'we made most of this up' --

Statements made in this release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements”
and accordingly involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those described in this release.

I have grown to like Delphi and really really hope that isn't a death knell I hear tolling in the background.  Lets hope these guys learn the lessons Boreland seemed to ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Dear !!</p>
<p>All those glowing words, but just what IS the King wearing?</p>
<p>And at the end of the statement, something which looks alarmingly like - &#8216;we made most of this up&#8217; &#8211;</p>
<p>Statements made in this release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements”<br />
and accordingly involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ<br />
materially from those described in this release.</p>
<p>I have grown to like Delphi and really really hope that isn&#8217;t a death knell I hear tolling in the background.  Lets hope these guys learn the lessons Boreland seemed to ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19628</link>
		<author>C Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19628</guid>
		<description>Nick -&#62; True, but darn near everyone has, and I'll even grant that 1+1=3 IS indeed the actual concept of synergy (rare to see that people actually know it!)  still, business buzz words...

As to everyone else asking for forward looking comments.  I'm gonna take a wild shot in the dark and say that CodeGear is going to continue avoiding them as long as they are Borland property.  After the deal is finalized and everyone starts getting new business cards - then, then we'll regime change brings us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick -&gt; True, but darn near everyone has, and I&#8217;ll even grant that 1+1=3 IS indeed the actual concept of synergy (rare to see that people actually know it!)  still, business buzz words&#8230;</p>
<p>As to everyone else asking for forward looking comments.  I&#8217;m gonna take a wild shot in the dark and say that CodeGear is going to continue avoiding them as long as they are Borland property.  After the deal is finalized and everyone starts getting new business cards - then, then we&#8217;ll regime change brings us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19627</link>
		<author>Mike Jackson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19627</guid>
		<description>How about a "Delphi Hour Special" with CodeGear and Embarcadero people discussing how you see the company moving forward?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a "Delphi Hour Special" with CodeGear and Embarcadero people discussing how you see the company moving forward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eurish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19626</link>
		<author>eurish</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19626</guid>
		<description>What now is "Made in Borland"?

Some lines of Shelley come to mind:

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What now is "Made in Borland"?</p>
<p>Some lines of Shelley come to mind:</p>
<p>Nothing beside remains. Round the decay<br />
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare<br />
The lone and level sands stretch far away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19625</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19625</guid>
		<description>It'll be interesting to see how the next few months unfold. You'll decide what you are going to do, here's what I wouldn't do.

1) Don't radically deviate from the existing roadmap. Deliver on the existing promises before moving on. Commodore...
2) Don't loose the focus on Micros ISV's
3) Don't forget the products that made you and sustained you through the evolving Borland ALM beast.
4). Don't let quality suffer at the expense of shiny new products and features.

In a nutshell, make sure you keep SKU's relevant to the existing customer base and not simply shoot off after the pot of gold at the end of the Embarcadero enterprise rainbow.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how the next few months unfold. You&#8217;ll decide what you are going to do, here&#8217;s what I wouldn&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>1) Don&#8217;t radically deviate from the existing roadmap. Deliver on the existing promises before moving on. Commodore&#8230;<br />
2) Don&#8217;t loose the focus on Micros ISV&#8217;s<br />
3) Don&#8217;t forget the products that made you and sustained you through the evolving Borland ALM beast.<br />
4). Don&#8217;t let quality suffer at the expense of shiny new products and features.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, make sure you keep SKU&#8217;s relevant to the existing customer base and not simply shoot off after the pot of gold at the end of the Embarcadero enterprise rainbow.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19624</link>
		<author>Dennis</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19624</guid>
		<description>This may be good, but doesn't sound like. I'm a developer and currently working on a project, which I had to argue very hard to use delphi as the primary coding language (apart from some c'dlls) - "delphi? what company?" - "Codegear. Former Borland" - "Borland? You mean Inprise or what?" - "no. now Codegear. Sorry. now "Embargo" (or something like that)". Very hard to argue. Looks like I'm lost on the next project (i'll guess it will be c# then).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be good, but doesn&#8217;t sound like. I&#8217;m a developer and currently working on a project, which I had to argue very hard to use delphi as the primary coding language (apart from some c&#8217;dlls) - "delphi? what company?" - "Codegear. Former Borland" - "Borland? You mean Inprise or what?" - "no. now Codegear. Sorry. now "Embargo" (or something like that)". Very hard to argue. Looks like I&#8217;m lost on the next project (i&#8217;ll guess it will be c# then).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19619</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 06:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19619</guid>
		<description>"he (the CEO) misspelled "complimentary" all 3 times in that letter to all his customers"

His use of "complementary" is correct in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"he (the CEO) misspelled "complimentary" all 3 times in that letter to all his customers"</p>
<p>His use of "complementary" is correct in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Jake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19618</link>
		<author>Captain Jake</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19618</guid>
		<description>Also, since Greg Keller is located in Boulder, any chance that you or any of the other Borlanders will be out this way any time soon? It would be uber-cool to get together for lunch or something if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, since Greg Keller is located in Boulder, any chance that you or any of the other Borlanders will be out this way any time soon? It would be uber-cool to get together for lunch or something if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Jake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19617</link>
		<author>Captain Jake</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19617</guid>
		<description>Greg Keller's blog says all the right things, in the right way, except for the need for some proofreading. Even though I am employed making shrink-wrapped software that has no database back-end, I think this whole Embarcadero thing could be very good in the long haul, because it has the real potential to ensure a good future for Delphi, by making the high-end versions very attractive to enterprises finally. The mind boggles at the possibility of a high-end Delphi that integrates things like ER/Studio directly into the IDE with native code generation for multiple platforms.

My personal software projects (newsreader, then email program) will stay in Delphi indefinitely, so I am looking forward to Unicode and eventually a cross-platform Delphi. Maybe Embarcadero is exactly the right overlords to make this finally happen. Some of us have very high hopes, don't let us down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Keller&#8217;s blog says all the right things, in the right way, except for the need for some proofreading. Even though I am employed making shrink-wrapped software that has no database back-end, I think this whole Embarcadero thing could be very good in the long haul, because it has the real potential to ensure a good future for Delphi, by making the high-end versions very attractive to enterprises finally. The mind boggles at the possibility of a high-end Delphi that integrates things like ER/Studio directly into the IDE with native code generation for multiple platforms.</p>
<p>My personal software projects (newsreader, then email program) will stay in Delphi indefinitely, so I am looking forward to Unicode and eventually a cross-platform Delphi. Maybe Embarcadero is exactly the right overlords to make this finally happen. Some of us have very high hopes, don&#8217;t let us down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19616</link>
		<author>Fred</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19616</guid>
		<description>i'm a little concerned now....he (the CEO) misspelled "complimentary" all 3 times in that letter to all his customers.  "automate error-prone tasks".  MS Word has automated error prone tasks....and it didn't work in that most important letter!  come on now.... LOL! ...and $100MM ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m a little concerned now&#8230;.he (the CEO) misspelled "complimentary" all 3 times in that letter to all his customers.  "automate error-prone tasks".  MS Word has automated error prone tasks&#8230;.and it didn&#8217;t work in that most important letter!  come on now&#8230;. LOL! &#8230;and $100MM ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcunite</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19615</link>
		<author>pcunite</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19615</guid>
		<description>To really make us feel better have the CEO use the words "Delphi and C++ builder". Let's don't forge C++ Builder in all this hysteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To really make us feel better have the CEO use the words "Delphi and C++ builder". Let&#8217;s don&#8217;t forge C++ Builder in all this hysteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Moran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19614</link>
		<author>Steve Moran</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19614</guid>
		<description>I like the enthusiasm. And I love databases. Somebody has to. Sounds cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the enthusiasm. And I love databases. Somebody has to. Sounds cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19613</link>
		<author>Nick Hodges</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19613</guid>
		<description>Clinton --

For the record, my post did not include the word "synergy".  ;-)

And as a second point:  Embarcadero is most decidedly not an "ALM Company".

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton &#8211;</p>
<p>For the record, my post did not include the word "synergy".  <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And as a second point:  Embarcadero is most decidedly not an "ALM Company".</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela MJ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19612</link>
		<author>Mihaela MJ</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19612</guid>
		<description>I'm glad that you're all thrilled, that's a good sign, I guess, and hope for the best. Congrats.
Still am waiting for the Tiburon to upgrade.
And a question, as I'm in EMEA (Croatia), what will happen to Borland resellers, who do I turn to to buy Tiburon when the time comes?

All the best to you and your team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that you&#8217;re all thrilled, that&#8217;s a good sign, I guess, and hope for the best. Congrats.<br />
Still am waiting for the Tiburon to upgrade.<br />
And a question, as I&#8217;m in EMEA (Croatia), what will happen to Borland resellers, who do I turn to to buy Tiburon when the time comes?</p>
<p>All the best to you and your team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19611</link>
		<author>C Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/05/07/39058#comment-19611</guid>
		<description>I see potential here, and less of the sky falling, that said, I wish people would stop using the word "synergy" - as in "After the synergy gets you" (Wally from Dilbert).

Its great the behind Embarcadero is a private investment firm, however, I wish this felt less like an echo of the ALM purchases Borland made.

That said, getting away from Borland management is a good thing, and its hard to see a firm that has been as successful as Embarcadero pulling some of the same boneheaded decissions. The private ownership might even make that a lock.

Looking forward to see where this goes. (hopefully the prioritization of Linq like technologies in the win32 world!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see potential here, and less of the sky falling, that said, I wish people would stop using the word "synergy" - as in "After the synergy gets you" (Wally from Dilbert).</p>
<p>Its great the behind Embarcadero is a private investment firm, however, I wish this felt less like an echo of the ALM purchases Borland made.</p>
<p>That said, getting away from Borland management is a good thing, and its hard to see a firm that has been as successful as Embarcadero pulling some of the same boneheaded decissions. The private ownership might even make that a lock.</p>
<p>Looking forward to see where this goes. (hopefully the prioritization of Linq like technologies in the win32 world!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
