<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #62</title>
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Fabricio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19377</link>
		<author>Fabricio</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19377</guid>
		<description>Nick,

What’s happened to http://homepages.codegear.com??

It’s simply does not load (i tried the domain index, jvcl homepage, and some others).

It’s just me or there is a problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>What’s happened to <a href="http://homepages.codegear.com??" rel="nofollow">http://homepages.codegear.com??</a></p>
<p>It’s simply does not load (i tried the domain index, jvcl homepage, and some others).</p>
<p>It’s just me or there is a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19374</link>
		<author>dennis</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19374</guid>
		<description>I'll wager the Practical UML article takes a measurable popularity jump after showing up here. Excellent tutorial. Guess this is one case where popularity parallels quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll wager the Practical UML article takes a measurable popularity jump after showing up here. Excellent tutorial. Guess this is one case where popularity parallels quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix COLIBRI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19366</link>
		<author>Felix COLIBRI</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19366</guid>
		<description>Practical UML : this article certainly deserves it. But I still wonder whether UML is that much used by Delphi developers for their projects, beyond the ECO adepts. Aside from pure UML presentation subjects, you seldom see even a Class Diagram in the articles, the books, the .SWF movies, the conference slides or the Delphi help. This seems not to be the case for the Java or C# communities where UML is used, at least in the presentation articles. We use UML all the time, for papers, training and development, and are grateful that Delphi added the modeling features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practical UML : this article certainly deserves it. But I still wonder whether UML is that much used by Delphi developers for their projects, beyond the ECO adepts. Aside from pure UML presentation subjects, you seldom see even a Class Diagram in the articles, the books, the .SWF movies, the conference slides or the Delphi help. This seems not to be the case for the Java or C# communities where UML is used, at least in the presentation articles. We use UML all the time, for papers, training and development, and are grateful that Delphi added the modeling features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19361</link>
		<author>C Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2008/03/26/39042#comment-19361</guid>
		<description>Ya, except that MS is quickly becoming more are more top heavy and is spending ever more time deciding how to get something done rather than actually getting it done.  A system can go to far, and MS is definitely into the twilight territory now.

Which explains why even now there are zero "power toys" for vista and the ultimate extras program has been an ultimate failure.

There has to be a balance between procedure and performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, except that MS is quickly becoming more are more top heavy and is spending ever more time deciding how to get something done rather than actually getting it done.  A system can go to far, and MS is definitely into the twilight territory now.</p>
<p>Which explains why even now there are zero "power toys" for vista and the ultimate extras program has been an ultimate failure.</p>
<p>There has to be a balance between procedure and performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
