<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Doctor is In: Product Manager as Psycho-Analyst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wouter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator>Wouter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-6391</guid>
		<description>John said:
"Sorry about that, typing in a hurry"

---

Nice example. 

Paired Message Posting would've taken care of that typo. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John said:<br />
"Sorry about that, typing in a hurry"</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Nice example. </p>
<p>Paired Message Posting would&#8217;ve taken care of that typo. <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5393</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5393</guid>
		<description>Correction: "Employee" should clearly be "employer".

Sorry about that, typing in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: "Employee" should clearly be "employer".</p>
<p>Sorry about that, typing in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5392</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5392</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

Regarding "Pair programming" or "Extreme Programing", as a developer I see it as the ultimate technique to achieve the best possible results (ever). 
We have a very skilfull team and all of us tackle a problem from a different angle/expertise, however, when we *do* some coding together the solution is often *FAR* better than any of us alone would come up.

Unfortunately, no employee will ever allow it (two salaries to get "one" result). 

Of course, there's all the hidden benefits like almost 0 bugs, best performance, best "style" (does it count?), faster development - but all of this seems secondary when allocating a development budget :)

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>Regarding "Pair programming" or "Extreme Programing", as a developer I see it as the ultimate technique to achieve the best possible results (ever).<br />
We have a very skilfull team and all of us tackle a problem from a different angle/expertise, however, when we *do* some coding together the solution is often *FAR* better than any of us alone would come up.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no employee will ever allow it (two salaries to get "one" result). </p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s all the hidden benefits like almost 0 bugs, best performance, best "style" (does it count?), faster development - but all of this seems secondary when allocating a development budget <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Stratford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5015</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Stratford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-5015</guid>
		<description>Of course, one of the other benefits (at least, in my experience) is describing a problem to someone, and in the process of describing it, the solution becomes clear in a blinding flash!

Then I have to mumble a quick excuse, and get back to my workstation to test out the theory.

That and having sufficient quiet time in "the smallest room in the house".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, one of the other benefits (at least, in my experience) is describing a problem to someone, and in the process of describing it, the solution becomes clear in a blinding flash!</p>
<p>Then I have to mumble a quick excuse, and get back to my workstation to test out the theory.</p>
<p>That and having sufficient quiet time in "the smallest room in the house".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodges</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>Joe --

No, I dont' see them doing much "formal" pair programming -- that doesn't seem to be the way folks work.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8211;</p>
<p>No, I dont&#8217; see them doing much "formal" pair programming &#8212; that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the way folks work.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>Things are so easy. Recent surveys say: Win32, no .net. More bug fixes. Reliable and fast Help system, no doc explorer. Win64 and Linux story. More new language features in the compiler. Better VCL (more Graphics formats, ...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are so easy. Recent surveys say: Win32, no .net. More bug fixes. Reliable and fast Help system, no doc explorer. Win64 and Linux story. More new language features in the compiler. Better VCL (more Graphics formats, &#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>Do the Delphi devs ever do any pair programming (two programmers at one keyboard)? It gives all the benefits you described, but with a much shorter feedback loop -- instead of getting up and walking to someone else's office once every few days, you get feedback instantly and continuously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Delphi devs ever do any pair programming (two programmers at one keyboard)? It gives all the benefits you described, but with a much shorter feedback loop &#8212; instead of getting up and walking to someone else&#8217;s office once every few days, you get feedback instantly and continuously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitry Timokhov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitry Timokhov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4682</guid>
		<description>Hi, Nick.

I dont have anyone who could listen to me and my tech language :(

I have a boss, but he is businessmen, not an IT member.

Be sure, Nick, that having someone who could listen developer's genius idea it very important for every developer!

Keep it on, I see increasing quality of Delphi. I think that Delphi is returning. And very important thing is morale of developers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Nick.</p>
<p>I dont have anyone who could listen to me and my tech language <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have a boss, but he is businessmen, not an IT member.</p>
<p>Be sure, Nick, that having someone who could listen developer&#8217;s genius idea it very important for every developer!</p>
<p>Keep it on, I see increasing quality of Delphi. I think that Delphi is returning. And very important thing is morale of developers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kryvich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4665</link>
		<dc:creator>Kryvich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/10/31/38972#comment-4665</guid>
		<description>While it is true, I think a blog is another good way to "talk" about somebody's ideas and to get much wider response. And it's free. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is true, I think a blog is another good way to "talk" about somebody&#8217;s ideas and to get much wider response. And it&#8217;s free. <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
