<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updates and Releases &#8212; an Explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pepe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3712</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3712</guid>
		<description>"hundreds and hundreds of fixes for an already very solid product"

so funny 

I've been with borland since turbo pascal 3.15 and then delphi, im worried about the bloated it is getting to be

i hope Delphi8 and BDS2006 phantom doesn't strike again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"hundreds and hundreds of fixes for an already very solid product"</p>
<p>so funny </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been with borland since turbo pascal 3.15 and then delphi, im worried about the bloated it is getting to be</p>
<p>i hope Delphi8 and BDS2006 phantom doesn&#8217;t strike again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Aymon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Aymon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>What about another useful scenario:


""A couple of months ago, you bought Delphi 2007 with Software Assurance, then [...]""

Are ""Support and Maintenance Customers"" the same as the ones who bought the ""Software Assurance""? I yes, then I guess that the scenario:

""will be able to download the install and get their keys online"" applies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about another useful scenario:</p>
<p>""A couple of months ago, you bought Delphi 2007 with Software Assurance, then [...]""</p>
<p>Are ""Support and Maintenance Customers"" the same as the ones who bought the ""Software Assurance""? I yes, then I guess that the scenario:</p>
<p>""will be able to download the install and get their keys online"" applies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Dowling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>I posted this on Chris Pattinsons blog also, apologies for the double up, but hopefully either of the two of your will be able to figure it out.  I wasn't sure what blog post it was more relevant too (Probably this one)

---
Regarding downloading the ISO


I have had a problem downloading the 4.2GB ISO image. I’ve tried 4 different times and it has stopped at 88%, 95%, 95% and 50% respectively. 

I’ve tried using FlashGet, and Free Download Manager but they get to a point where they are no longer able to resume the download. Using the FTP Server as the source they send the resume command with the correct syntax, but the FTP Server simply says the transfer is complete right away..

i.e.

REST 4270456832
RETR CodeGearRadStudio2007_v11.0.2804.9245.5.iso
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for CodeGearRadStudio2007_v11.0.2804.9245.5.iso (4467032064 Bytes)
Transfer Complete

Is this due to the servers being overloaded or another problem?

Would it be possible to get teh ISO split up into say 100mb chunks or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this on Chris Pattinsons blog also, apologies for the double up, but hopefully either of the two of your will be able to figure it out.  I wasn&#8217;t sure what blog post it was more relevant too (Probably this one)</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Regarding downloading the ISO</p>
<p>I have had a problem downloading the 4.2GB ISO image. I’ve tried 4 different times and it has stopped at 88%, 95%, 95% and 50% respectively. </p>
<p>I’ve tried using FlashGet, and Free Download Manager but they get to a point where they are no longer able to resume the download. Using the FTP Server as the source they send the resume command with the correct syntax, but the FTP Server simply says the transfer is complete right away..</p>
<p>i.e.</p>
<p>REST 4270456832<br />
RETR CodeGearRadStudio2007_v11.0.2804.9245.5.iso<br />
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for CodeGearRadStudio2007_v11.0.2804.9245.5.iso (4467032064 Bytes)<br />
Transfer Complete</p>
<p>Is this due to the servers being overloaded or another problem?</p>
<p>Would it be possible to get teh ISO split up into say 100mb chunks or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac7</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>CR, I understand that this update is free and that a lot of bugs seem to be cleared (ain't we're talking about the 11th/12th version of this compiler?). Thanks for this bug-fixing! But they, Codegear, add a brand-new-untested SQL DB and ask us, their customers to pay for it and test this.
$1.274 for an Enterprise update or better spoken, for this Blackfish SQL and the DBX4client? No, not me. MS SQLServer Express works pretty good. . .
Sorry for those harsh words, but I'm a bit frustrated ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CR, I understand that this update is free and that a lot of bugs seem to be cleared (ain&#8217;t we&#8217;re talking about the 11th/12th version of this compiler?). Thanks for this bug-fixing! But they, Codegear, add a brand-new-untested SQL DB and ask us, their customers to pay for it and test this.<br />
$1.274 for an Enterprise update or better spoken, for this Blackfish SQL and the DBX4client? No, not me. MS SQLServer Express works pretty good. . .<br />
Sorry for those harsh words, but I&#8217;m a bit frustrated <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3409</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3409</guid>
		<description>Mac7 - update 3, including the help updates, is *free*. All R2 adds (I think) is Blackfish and the query builder, so it's doubtful a person who had bought the original version of D2007 (and so without SA) would desperately want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac7 - update 3, including the help updates, is *free*. All R2 adds (I think) is Blackfish and the query builder, so it&#8217;s doubtful a person who had bought the original version of D2007 (and so without SA) would desperately want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac7</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>Once again, if I do understand this the right way, a totally wrong approach IMHO. Those, who paid for the original D2007 (and for how many elder versions...), shall pay once again for this  version.
How much did it cost me and many, many other developers to debug problems that occurred with the original version? How many hours did every developer spend trying to cope with this crappy help-system? How...?

Wouldn't it have been a real good opportunity to pay-back a little bit?!

just my two cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, if I do understand this the right way, a totally wrong approach IMHO. Those, who paid for the original D2007 (and for how many elder versions&#8230;), shall pay once again for this  version.<br />
How much did it cost me and many, many other developers to debug problems that occurred with the original version? How many hours did every developer spend trying to cope with this crappy help-system? How&#8230;?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it have been a real good opportunity to pay-back a little bit?!</p>
<p>just my two cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Serg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>The blogger does not read comments or confused by version zoo like everybody else. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blogger does not read comments or confused by version zoo like everybody else. <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>Can we reasonably expect a new release of Turbo Delphi in the near future ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we reasonably expect a new release of Turbo Delphi in the near future ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mueller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

now I am even more confused:
Is Delphi 2007 R2 the same as Delphi 2007 + Update 3?

twm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>now I am even more confused:<br />
Is Delphi 2007 R2 the same as Delphi 2007 + Update 3?</p>
<p>twm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3383</link>
		<dc:creator>Serg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3383</guid>
		<description>Please make it clear - is there any difference between Delphi 2007 R2 and Rad Studio 2007 win32 personality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make it clear - is there any difference between Delphi 2007 R2 and Rad Studio 2007 win32 personality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keld Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Keld Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>Will it be possible for SA customers to download an ISO DVD Image of RAD Studio 2007?

And will it be possible to install only the Win32 personality and then - at a later date - add the other personalities without uninstalling the Win32 version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it be possible for SA customers to download an ISO DVD Image of RAD Studio 2007?</p>
<p>And will it be possible to install only the Win32 personality and then - at a later date - add the other personalities without uninstalling the Win32 version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Bauer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>The "download the setup executable." link looks like it is pointing to someplace on your hard drive :-).. I can't browse to that no matter how hard I try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "download the setup executable." link looks like it is pointing to someplace on your hard drive :-).. I can&#8217;t browse to that no matter how hard I try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Vinal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Vinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>Oh, I mean when I do the last option - buy (already have it) RAD Studio and install it over D2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I mean when I do the last option - buy (already have it) RAD Studio and install it over D2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Vinal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Vinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/09/14/38940#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>Just checking - I do not have to reinstall all of the components I installed for D2007 Win 32, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checking - I do not have to reinstall all of the components I installed for D2007 Win 32, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
