<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New CodeGear Logo</title>
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1491</link>
		<author>Anon</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>The anonymously designed logo is much, much better than this one. I would also like to mention that red on black theme of the new CodeGear site is an abomination of design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anonymously designed logo is much, much better than this one. I would also like to mention that red on black theme of the new CodeGear site is an abomination of design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnie Norsworthy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1392</link>
		<author>Johnnie Norsworthy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>You truly are joking - a bit late for April Fools day. The &#34;new logo&#34; was written in turtle graphics by turtles that are clearly intoxicated. Please recycle all paper goods with this new logo.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You truly are joking - a bit late for April Fools day. The &quot;new logo&quot; was written in turtle graphics by turtles that are clearly intoxicated. Please recycle all paper goods with this new logo.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2881</link>
		<author>daveg</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2881</guid>
		<description>I'll try to make my comments constructive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) The C/G O/E overlaps are awkward.  &lt;br&gt;2) Because of (1), the A looks short.&lt;br&gt;3) The R, on the other hand looks clipped at the top.&lt;br&gt;4) The &#34;tail&#34; of the R is clipped to an unattractive square point.&lt;br&gt;5) Both E's should have the same design.&lt;br&gt;6) The sharp turns on the left of the C and G are awkward (again, clipping).&lt;br&gt;7) The D and E touch at a point, which seems inconsistent with the rest of the logo.  Logically, it seems the D should be obscuring part of the E.&lt;br&gt;8) The A is pushed over too much into the R.  In other words, the A overlaps with the R more than it overlaps with the E - not symmetric.&lt;br&gt;9) Overall, there is an appearance of three layers: CO on top, then GEAR, and DE on the bottom.  This is actually a combination of overlap and color.  The eye catches the overlap first, then it's drawn to the brighter red color, and finally back to DE.  This kind of eye movement is generally a bad idea in a logo.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a non-design-related note: The &#34;from Borland&#34; bit is a let-down.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll try to make my comments constructive.</p>
<p>1) The C/G O/E overlaps are awkward.<br />
<br />2) Because of (1), the A looks short.<br />
<br />3) The R, on the other hand looks clipped at the top.<br />
<br />4) The &quot;tail&quot; of the R is clipped to an unattractive square point.<br />
<br />5) Both E&#8217;s should have the same design.<br />
<br />6) The sharp turns on the left of the C and G are awkward (again, clipping).<br />
<br />7) The D and E touch at a point, which seems inconsistent with the rest of the logo.  Logically, it seems the D should be obscuring part of the E.<br />
<br /> <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> The A is pushed over too much into the R.  In other words, the A overlaps with the R more than it overlaps with the E - not symmetric.<br />
<br />9) Overall, there is an appearance of three layers: CO on top, then GEAR, and DE on the bottom.  This is actually a combination of overlap and color.  The eye catches the overlap first, then it&#8217;s drawn to the brighter red color, and finally back to DE.  This kind of eye movement is generally a bad idea in a logo.  </p>
<p>On a non-design-related note: The &quot;from Borland&quot; bit is a let-down.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Woods</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1380</link>
		<author>Scott Woods</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>The more I look at it the more I like it.  It grows on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I look at it the more I like it.  It grows on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1373</link>
		<author>Andrews</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>New thing always take times to be accepted,I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New thing always take times to be accepted,I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1367</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>I think the logo is a poor attempt. Simple as that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Writing the name out in Arial Bold 12 would actually be better than what you have come up with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Roll back to start, and give it another try.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, if someone within CodeGear thinks that easy convertibility into icons should be an important design factor, duct tape their mouths shut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the logo is a poor attempt. Simple as that.</p>
<p>Writing the name out in Arial Bold 12 would actually be better than what you have come up with.</p>
<p>Roll back to start, and give it another try.</p>
<p>Also, if someone within CodeGear thinks that easy convertibility into icons should be an important design factor, duct tape their mouths shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2874</link>
		<author>Bob</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but it's completely lame.  I hope you haven't printed too much stationery.  How about doing a poll next time you're thinking about a new logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but it&#8217;s completely lame.  I hope you haven&#8217;t printed too much stationery.  How about doing a poll next time you&#8217;re thinking about a new logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2873</link>
		<author>Fons</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>The anonymous contribution is by far the better of the two. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will still use Delphi, but I won't includes such ugly logo in my apps or website. Proud to be a Delphi user, but not that proud to mess up my work with such a bad and cheap designed piece of crap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way Delphi is heading under the wings of CodeGear is great, so to bad that this little thing is not of the same standard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And to response to Impatient Delphi Loyalist's remark: a logo is way more important than you think - it has a strong association with the quality of the productes. The same way most people first rate an application by purely judging it at how it looks. This is the same with a logo - if it is bad, so will the company wich uses it. If it does not look professional, than that company is not either. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As suggested, CodeGear should have done it differently. The company my father works for, just awarded the best logo with a relative cheap prize to anyone who sent in the best logo and new name for that company after two companies joined forces. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I said, I will stick with Delphi and CodeGear (did not yet received D2007 but I expect it within a couple of days), but new customers may be put off by this ugly logo!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fons&lt;br&gt;The Netherlands&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anonymous contribution is by far the better of the two. </p>
<p>I will still use Delphi, but I won&#8217;t includes such ugly logo in my apps or website. Proud to be a Delphi user, but not that proud to mess up my work with such a bad and cheap designed piece of crap.</p>
<p>The way Delphi is heading under the wings of CodeGear is great, so to bad that this little thing is not of the same standard.</p>
<p>And to response to Impatient Delphi Loyalist&#8217;s remark: a logo is way more important than you think - it has a strong association with the quality of the productes. The same way most people first rate an application by purely judging it at how it looks. This is the same with a logo - if it is bad, so will the company wich uses it. If it does not look professional, than that company is not either. </p>
<p>As suggested, CodeGear should have done it differently. The company my father works for, just awarded the best logo with a relative cheap prize to anyone who sent in the best logo and new name for that company after two companies joined forces. </p>
<p>As I said, I will stick with Delphi and CodeGear (did not yet received D2007 but I expect it within a couple of days), but new customers may be put off by this ugly logo!</p>
<p>Fons<br />
<br />The Netherlands<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2872</link>
		<author>Diego</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>My first impression upon seeing the new logo was that it looks unprofessional. And I still think so when I see it. It seems lik it's an in-house job. Someone firing up Photoshop thinking they could knock-up a logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impression upon seeing the new logo was that it looks unprofessional. And I still think so when I see it. It seems lik it&#8217;s an in-house job. Someone firing up Photoshop thinking they could knock-up a logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Postma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2871</link>
		<author>Warren Postma</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>I like the anonymous contrib much better:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png"&gt;http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was going to design one myself and send it to you. It would have had gear-like teeth on&lt;br&gt;the C and the G.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I dislike most about the new logo you posted is the bad kerning and the way the&lt;br&gt;CO in code clips part of the letters GE in the second word. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, I think the CodeGear left to right (wide) is better looking than one above the other, but if you're going to put one above the other, at least make a visual play with gears, of some kind!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my $0.02.  My employers hired a graphic designer to design a new logo, spent lots of money on the logo, and in the end, I like the amateur one we had before. It was better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't trust marketing types very far, I guess.  If I was you guys, I'd pick a logo my customers liked, although it's entirely up to you, and I'll buy the product either way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's just it would be nice if it looked good. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And hey, while we're all egotistically suggesting things, let me show you the CodeGear logo I just drew:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.warrenpostma.com/pictures/codegear_logo_by_warren.png"&gt;http://www.warrenpostma.com/pictures/codegear_logo_by_warren.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mine is kind of influenced stylistically&lt;br&gt;by the &#34;Rocketeer&#34;, and evokes, IMHO,&lt;br&gt;that good old American Yankee Innovation,&lt;br&gt;gears, polished brass, heavy industry, &lt;br&gt;that sort of thing.  Kind of steam-punk,&lt;br&gt;I guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the anonymous contrib much better:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png">http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png</a></p>
<p>I was going to design one myself and send it to you. It would have had gear-like teeth on<br />
<br />the C and the G.</p>
<p>What I dislike most about the new logo you posted is the bad kerning and the way the<br />
<br />CO in code clips part of the letters GE in the second word. </p>
<p>Secondly, I think the CodeGear left to right (wide) is better looking than one above the other, but if you&#8217;re going to put one above the other, at least make a visual play with gears, of some kind!</p>
<p>Just my $0.02.  My employers hired a graphic designer to design a new logo, spent lots of money on the logo, and in the end, I like the amateur one we had before. It was better.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust marketing types very far, I guess.  If I was you guys, I&#8217;d pick a logo my customers liked, although it&#8217;s entirely up to you, and I&#8217;ll buy the product either way. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just it would be nice if it looked good. <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And hey, while we&#8217;re all egotistically suggesting things, let me show you the CodeGear logo I just drew:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.warrenpostma.com/pictures/codegear_logo_by_warren.png">http://www.warrenpostma.com/pictures/codegear_logo_by_warren.png</a></p>
<p>Mine is kind of influenced stylistically<br />
<br />by the &quot;Rocketeer&quot;, and evokes, IMHO,<br />
<br />that good old American Yankee Innovation,<br />
<br />gears, polished brass, heavy industry,<br />
<br />that sort of thing.  Kind of steam-punk,<br />
<br />I guess.</p>
<p>Warren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2868</link>
		<author>Ray Andrews</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>The font for the new logo looks like it was taken off the side of the video game in &#34;The Last Starfighter&#34;, yeah, that old, and that lame. If that had been sprung on us in another week, say, April 1'st, I might understand.  Somebody please google &#34;logo design&#34;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The font for the new logo looks like it was taken off the side of the video game in &quot;The Last Starfighter&quot;, yeah, that old, and that lame. If that had been sprung on us in another week, say, April 1&#8217;st, I might understand.  Somebody please google &quot;logo design&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2867</link>
		<author>C Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>Ok, enough.  Let's get a real measure of the quality of a logo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who wants a coffee cup with this logo on it?  Would you put any effort into seeking out a free one if you had to work at it, would you pay 20$ to someone like cafe express to get one?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given a free tshirt with this logo printed 12&#34;x12&#34; across the back, would you wear it or toss it to the dog after an event?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, for one, will stick with my Squirrelly Wrath mug for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, enough.  Let&#8217;s get a real measure of the quality of a logo.</p>
<p>Who wants a coffee cup with this logo on it?  Would you put any effort into seeking out a free one if you had to work at it, would you pay 20$ to someone like cafe express to get one?</p>
<p>Given a free tshirt with this logo printed 12&quot;x12&quot; across the back, would you wear it or toss it to the dog after an event?</p>
<p>I, for one, will stick with my Squirrelly Wrath mug for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Swindell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2866</link>
		<author>Michael Swindell</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62; I took your advice and looked at the new logo several times over the last few days. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone has their own tastes. But I think we've had the benefit of seeing all the materials that the logo will be used in. So we're responding to it in a different context and with more information which isn't fair. We'll certainly pass on the feedback to the marketing team. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; I took your advice and looked at the new logo several times over the last few days. </p>
<p>Everyone has their own tastes. But I think we&#8217;ve had the benefit of seeing all the materials that the logo will be used in. So we&#8217;re responding to it in a different context and with more information which isn&#8217;t fair. We&#8217;ll certainly pass on the feedback to the marketing team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Melander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1333</link>
		<author>Anders Melander</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Was the new logo designed by the same guys that came up with &#34;Inprise&#34;...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the new logo designed by the same guys that came up with &quot;Inprise&quot;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter wokke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1332</link>
		<author>peter wokke</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>To all the codegear people,&lt;br&gt;Please read all messages and change the logo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all the codegear people,<br />
<br />Please read all messages and change the logo.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUIS MADALENO</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2865</link>
		<author>LUIS MADALENO</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>Who did this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first CG logo is nice. This one just doesn't make it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please change it or keep the first one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luis Madaleno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who did this?</p>
<p>The first CG logo is nice. This one just doesn&#8217;t make it.</p>
<p>Please change it or keep the first one.</p>
<p>Luis Madaleno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Altaireon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1330</link>
		<author>Altaireon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Michael:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I took your advice and looked at the new logo several times over the last few days.  I must admit your &#147;down and dirty&#148; is far more appealing to me than the holistic approach you are advocating.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sure it&#146;s my age, but the new logo seems like something my teenage son would do, and your &#147;down and dirty&#148; seems like something I would do.  I supposed it depends on the market you are targeting which logo is appropriate.  If CodeGear and Delphi are to have any long term viable future though, we need to target and recruit younger developers (I&#146;ve seen some photos of various Delphi user groups recently, and the spring chickens are far and few).  I suppose from that perspective, it may be rather appealing to the younger crowd.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck with the logo.  I trust the denizens at CodeGear will make the right choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tom Martin&lt;br&gt;Delphi Centurion&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://delphicenturion.blogspot.com"&gt;http://delphicenturion.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:</p>
<p>I took your advice and looked at the new logo several times over the last few days.  I must admit your &#8220;down and dirty&#8221; is far more appealing to me than the holistic approach you are advocating.  </p>
<p>I am sure it&#8217;s my age, but the new logo seems like something my teenage son would do, and your &#8220;down and dirty&#8221; seems like something I would do.  I supposed it depends on the market you are targeting which logo is appropriate.  If CodeGear and Delphi are to have any long term viable future though, we need to target and recruit younger developers (I&#8217;ve seen some photos of various Delphi user groups recently, and the spring chickens are far and few).  I suppose from that perspective, it may be rather appealing to the younger crowd.</p>
<p>Good luck with the logo.  I trust the denizens at CodeGear will make the right choice.</p>
<p>Tom Martin<br />
<br />Delphi Centurion<br />
<br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://delphicenturion.blogspot.com">http://delphicenturion.blogspot.com</a><br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valley Girl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1328</link>
		<author>Valley Girl</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>Like, I hear you sell Jeans. Far out! Do you, like, ship to San Fernando Valley? Mmmmmwa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like, I hear you sell Jeans. Far out! Do you, like, ship to San Fernando Valley? Mmmmmwa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2863</link>
		<author>C Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>Nick -&#62; I like the 5 minute job Anonymous did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find the current incarnation to be dull, unimaginative, uninspirational.  It doesn't convey anything except the company's name and a sense that someone thought it was worth spending 4 minutes with mspaint to create it.  It has internal artistic inconsitancies that speak more to the need to spend another minute in MSPaint rather than any actual artistic intent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, I definitely do not like that ugly little gray bit hanging off the bottom.  Trust me, you want to get as far away from the Borland name as you can get.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like it was designed by committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I mentioned to Steve T, I understand you guys are excited about it, but I think you've mistaken the excitement for change for REAL excitment about the logo itself.  And as I mentioned to him, only time will really tell there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick -&gt; I like the 5 minute job Anonymous did.</p>
<p>I find the current incarnation to be dull, unimaginative, uninspirational.  It doesn&#8217;t convey anything except the company&#8217;s name and a sense that someone thought it was worth spending 4 minutes with mspaint to create it.  It has internal artistic inconsitancies that speak more to the need to spend another minute in MSPaint rather than any actual artistic intent.</p>
<p>And yes, I definitely do not like that ugly little gray bit hanging off the bottom.  Trust me, you want to get as far away from the Borland name as you can get.</p>
<p>It looks like it was designed by committee.</p>
<p>As I mentioned to Steve T, I understand you guys are excited about it, but I think you&#8217;ve mistaken the excitement for change for REAL excitment about the logo itself.  And as I mentioned to him, only time will really tell there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno Mendes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1325</link>
		<author>Nuno Mendes</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Imo, first logo was way better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imo, first logo was way better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Trowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2860</link>
		<author>Michael Trowe</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2860</guid>
		<description>@Impatient Delphi Loyalist:&lt;br&gt;You're right - but a good brand is needed to sell the products to new developers. And that's what we need: That CodeGear make revenue to have money for further development of their products.&lt;br&gt;And that would make us more productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Impatient Delphi Loyalist:<br />
<br />You&#8217;re right - but a good brand is needed to sell the products to new developers. And that&#8217;s what we need: That CodeGear make revenue to have money for further development of their products.<br />
<br />And that would make us more productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impatient Delphi Loyalist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2859</link>
		<author>Impatient Delphi Loyalist</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2859</guid>
		<description>Let's not expense anymore time fussing about logos. It is what it is. Its not going to make the Delphi compiler faster or make us developers more productive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its there. Deal with it and move on!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IDL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not expense anymore time fussing about logos. It is what it is. Its not going to make the Delphi compiler faster or make us developers more productive. </p>
<p>Its there. Deal with it and move on!</p>
<p>IDL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1318</link>
		<author>Dan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>Nahhh, that Anonymous guy is getting better... ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png"&gt;http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nahhh, that Anonymous guy is getting better&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png">http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png</a><br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1317</link>
		<author>Dan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>I vote for this one:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/9411/xcgfj3.png"&gt;http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/9411/xcgfj3.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Anonymous Coward GO Go GO !!&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for this one:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/9411/xcgfj3.png">http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/9411/xcgfj3.png</a></p>
<p>Go Anonymous Coward GO Go GO !!<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermes david montes de oca segovia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1313</link>
		<author>hermes david montes de oca segovia</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>surprisingly i like more the logo exposed by anonymous coward than the actual new logo.. because the new code gear logo looks like made on a rush by someone on corel draw on the lunch break.. absolutely not apropiate for such kind of company like codegear is ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surprisingly i like more the logo exposed by anonymous coward than the actual new logo.. because the new code gear logo looks like made on a rush by someone on corel draw on the lunch break.. absolutely not apropiate for such kind of company like codegear is &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1284</link>
		<author>Kevin Reynolds</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>I found an image of some of the new CodeGear branded products Michael Swindell mentioned:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tab_"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tab_&lt;/a&gt;(soft_drink)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knew that logo looked strangely familiar.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found an image of some of the new CodeGear branded products Michael Swindell mentioned:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tab_">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tab_</a>(soft_drink)</p>
<p>Knew that logo looked strangely familiar.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward :P</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1311</link>
		<author>Anonymous Coward :P</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>A couple variations for the heck of it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;White text, gears in red: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png"&gt;http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#34;Gear&#34; in red: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png"&gt;http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple variations for the heck of it:</p>
<p>White text, gears in red: <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png">http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/5166/xcg3sx0.png</a><br />
<br />&quot;Gear&quot; in red: <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png">http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/5451/xcg2bu3.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1308</link>
		<author>Zenon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you could give community a chance and create contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an example of the possible output quality  you can get see:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.nival.com/homm5/contest/prize/"&gt;http://www.nival.com/homm5/contest/prize/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those are IMHO amazing and with logo it should be much less work I belive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I think you could give community a chance and create contest.</p>
<p>As an example of the possible output quality  you can get see:<br />
<br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.nival.com/homm5/contest/prize/">http://www.nival.com/homm5/contest/prize/</a></p>
<p>Those are IMHO amazing and with logo it should be much less work I belive.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Flysj&#246;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2857</link>
		<author>Magnus Flysj&#246;</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>The logo made by &#34;Anonymous Coward&#34; above looks really great. I like the gears, but I think that the lower gear should be red as well. To bad it's not the logo that will be used. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logo made by &quot;Anonymous Coward&quot; above looks really great. I like the gears, but I think that the lower gear should be red as well. To bad it&#8217;s not the logo that will be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2856</link>
		<author>Unknown</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/nickhodges/2007/03/27/33518#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>It looks like a logo for a 1980's video arcade game machine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a logo for a 1980&#8217;s video arcade game machine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
