Let’s chat!

Just in time for CodeRage II, we are launching a public beta of our new chat server. We have a draft of the user guide available on the Developer Network. We’ll be using the new chat server for live Q&A during CodeRage sessions.

Come join us for CodeRage II, and feel free to help test out the new chat server interface right now, and give us feedback! You can see the current open chat room status at http://chat.codegear.com, and just click to join a chat.

Posted by John Kaster on November 20th, 2007 under CDN |



10 Responses to “Let’s chat!”

  1. Jens Fudge Says:

    Looking forward to Coderage II

  2. Lars D Says:

    This is great - and I can see that some words, like CodeGear and CodeRage become links, nice done :-)

    I would love to see some integration with other jabber compatible services, like Google Talk…

  3. Steven Summers Says:

    Is there a page somewhere that describes the technical requirements for getting the sessions to work well? How much bandwidth do we need? What browser works best? Any specific firewall or security settings we need to tweak? Is there a "test session" running somewhere so we can get things "tuned up" in advance, so we’re not fussing with it for the first two hours instead of hearing and seeing the sessions?

  4. Steven Summers Says:

    I did find some of this stuff on the site, but not the bandwidth question.

  5. Gene Norris Says:

    When I try to register for code rage I get the following:

    Internal Application Error

    Trying to store a string of length 30 into a field that can only contain 20

    /default

    30 doesn’t seem like a lot for an email address

  6. John Kaster Says:

    Lars: I’d like to get our own Jabber interface available first. There are plug-ins for OpenFire for other IM systems, so GoogleTalk and others are certainly feasible. Depends on how our server scales, I suppose!

    Steven: for our JWChat browser interface, only port 80 is required. XMPP is a bit chatty however, so it’s not going to be as efficient as a binary protocol. I don’t know about bandwidth needs yet, sorry. Some analysis will be doing will help.

    Gene: I’ll let Christine know the email field is too short. In our main customer database, I think it’s 80 chars, or whatever the RFC limit indicates. This CodeRage registration implementation should only be used for this one CodeRage. The next one should be using our existing customer account system.

  7. John Kaster Says:

    Gene: Spoke with Anders about the field length issue, and it’s not the email address since that can’t even be changed .. it’s probably the password field. Hope that helps.

  8. Bruce McGee Says:

    I had a chance to try it out a little with FireFox 3 beta 1 (MineField :), and I didn’t have any problems.

    Looks really good. Looking forward to CodeRage.

  9. John Kaster Says:

    Thanks for the compatibility report, Bruce

  10. Jonathan Benedicto Says:

    Thanks for CodeRage, was great!

Leave a Comment


Server Response from: dnrh1.codegear.com

 
© Copyright 2008 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Contact Us  |   Site Map  |   Legal Notices  |   Privacy Policy  |   Report Software Piracy