<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe McGlynn&#8217;s top ten reasons to love Ruby on Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/10/22/38826/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/10/22/38826</link>
	<description>David Intersimone (David I) CodeGear blog about programming, languages, history, and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: m. Th.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/10/22/38826#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>m. Th.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/10/22/38826#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Joe is responsible for C++Builder? Then what's the Alisdair's role?

Btw, even Joe mention 10 points many of them are arround the same RAD principle that we know, but from a different angle. 

Having the (almost) unique advantage to control end-to-end a programming environment (Delphi), why don't adapt some of the above points to your flagship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe is responsible for C++Builder? Then what&#8217;s the Alisdair&#8217;s role?</p>
<p>Btw, even Joe mention 10 points many of them are arround the same RAD principle that we know, but from a different angle. </p>
<p>Having the (almost) unique advantage to control end-to-end a programming environment (Delphi), why don&#8217;t adapt some of the above points to your flagship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
