<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s Listening, Listening, and then THERE&#8217;S LISTENING!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067</link>
	<description>David Intersimone (David I) CodeGear blog about programming, languages, history, and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Venter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-375</link>
		<author>Markus Venter</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Firebird Support??  Or am I the only one that sees this as a GREAT requirement from developers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firebird Support??  Or am I the only one that sees this as a GREAT requirement from developers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Hadlington</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-431</link>
		<author>Derek Hadlington</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Hi David. Great to see my issue has been resolved so promptly. Hat off to you all at CG !  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David. Great to see my issue has been resolved so promptly. Hat off to you all at CG !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Intersimone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-430</link>
		<author>David Intersimone</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-430</guid>
		<description>&#62; Is it possible to see a complete list of everything included in this release, all the small fixes, enhancements, QC items etc. If so could you please post the link. &lt;br&gt;Is some more fastcode stuff put into this release or other performance enhancements?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We will absolutely do this.  Once Delphi 2007 ships, the Quality Central (QC) system will be updated (like it has for the product versions before) with a R.I.B (Resolved in Build) build version number.  This will allow all users to do queries against QC to see what was fixed, closed, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Kaster wrote a CDN article about this for a previous version of Delphi. Check out the article at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33338"&gt;http://dn.codegear.com/article/33338&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Is it possible to see a complete list of everything included in this release, all the small fixes, enhancements, QC items etc. If so could you please post the link.<br />
<br />Is some more fastcode stuff put into this release or other performance enhancements?</p>
<p>We will absolutely do this.  Once Delphi 2007 ships, the Quality Central (QC) system will be updated (like it has for the product versions before) with a R.I.B (Resolved in Build) build version number.  This will allow all users to do queries against QC to see what was fixed, closed, etc.</p>
<p>John Kaster wrote a CDN article about this for a previous version of Delphi. Check out the article at <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33338">http://dn.codegear.com/article/33338</a><br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphi rocks!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-429</link>
		<author>Delphi rocks!</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to see a complete list of everything included in this release, all the small fixes, enhancements, QC items etc. If so could you please post the link.&lt;br&gt;Is some more fastcode stuff put into this release or other performance enhancements? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to see a complete list of everything included in this release, all the small fixes, enhancements, QC items etc. If so could you please post the link.<br />
<br />Is some more fastcode stuff put into this release or other performance enhancements? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-933</link>
		<author>Rick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Just in case you don't read Nick's blog and I am interested in your response :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a suggestion that IMHO would be in the best interest of CG and users: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CG should offer, for a limited time, the ability for any user of any product to purchase Software Assurance at the currently published SA prices. Effectively an upgrade to current version (from any previous version) and SA in one attractive price. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This would address the following biggest concerns: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a. D2007 cost is too high, on it's own. &lt;br&gt;b. CG deservses compensation for the new features (after all - we collectively asked for these - now). &lt;br&gt;c. Most improtant - get the masses to begin using D2007!!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I understand correctly, to get SA I have to buy/upgrade to the latest version and then additionally buy SA. Make SA more like an upgrade... after all it would appear that CG would like us all to have SA... so promote it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This would result in a more reasonable price to attain D2007 especialy because it will include anything else you decide to pump out in the next year. I for one would be less concerned about what you're plans are for the next year (aka roadmap), from a budgeting point of view. In fact, I would likely re-subsribe to SA indefeintaly... (providing you don't drastically alter the current proce point) since this allows both sides to budget. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS I don't mean to sound so negative... I am a big fan of Delphi and want to see it revivied in a big way (the potential is there)!  And although I don't use all the features I rest well at night knowing that I have a development suite that continues to evolve - giving me the ability to produce just about anything a client might ask for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you don&#8217;t read Nick&#8217;s blog and I am interested in your response <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have a suggestion that IMHO would be in the best interest of CG and users: </p>
<p>CG should offer, for a limited time, the ability for any user of any product to purchase Software Assurance at the currently published SA prices. Effectively an upgrade to current version (from any previous version) and SA in one attractive price. </p>
<p>This would address the following biggest concerns: </p>
<p>a. D2007 cost is too high, on it&#8217;s own.<br />
<br />b. CG deservses compensation for the new features (after all - we collectively asked for these - now).<br />
<br />c. Most improtant - get the masses to begin using D2007!!! </p>
<p>If I understand correctly, to get SA I have to buy/upgrade to the latest version and then additionally buy SA. Make SA more like an upgrade&#8230; after all it would appear that CG would like us all to have SA&#8230; so promote it. </p>
<p>This would result in a more reasonable price to attain D2007 especialy because it will include anything else you decide to pump out in the next year. I for one would be less concerned about what you&#8217;re plans are for the next year (aka roadmap), from a budgeting point of view. In fact, I would likely re-subsribe to SA indefeintaly&#8230; (providing you don&#8217;t drastically alter the current proce point) since this allows both sides to budget. </p>
<p>PS I don&#8217;t mean to sound so negative&#8230; I am a big fan of Delphi and want to see it revivied in a big way (the potential is there)!  And although I don&#8217;t use all the features I rest well at night knowing that I have a development suite that continues to evolve - giving me the ability to produce just about anything a client might ask for.</p>
<p>Rick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Ruz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-428</link>
		<author>Rodrigo Ruz</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Delphi in Spanish, Delphi in Spanish&lt;br&gt;Delphi en Espa&#241;ol, Delphi en Espa&#241;ol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi in Spanish, Delphi in Spanish<br />
<br />Delphi en Espa&#241;ol, Delphi en Espa&#241;ol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Intersimone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-427</link>
		<author>David Intersimone</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-427</guid>
		<description>&#62; Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is on the list of things we need to do.  Unicode database support is now included in DataBase Express (DBX) 4 for SQL databases that provide unicode support.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unicode support for Delphi / VCL is on the list of to do(s).&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode</p>
<p>It is on the list of things we need to do.  Unicode database support is now included in DataBase Express (DBX) 4 for SQL databases that provide unicode support.</p>
<p>Unicode support for Delphi / VCL is on the list of to do(s).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-426</link>
		<author>Mick</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, Unicode, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Intersimone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-425</link>
		<author>David Intersimone</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-425</guid>
		<description>&#62; If there is an aim to get NEW professional Delphi native developers on board no upgrade path for Turbo Delphi 2006 to the new 2007 Win32 is in my opinion a bad mistake. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is an upgrade path for Turbo Delphi 2006 Pro customers it is to upgrade to Delphi 2007 for Win32 Professional :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; If there is an aim to get NEW professional Delphi native developers on board no upgrade path for Turbo Delphi 2006 to the new 2007 Win32 is in my opinion a bad mistake. </p>
<p>There is an upgrade path for Turbo Delphi 2006 Pro customers it is to upgrade to Delphi 2007 for Win32 Professional <img src='http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Intersimone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-424</link>
		<author>David Intersimone</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2007/02/21/32067#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Turbo(s) are not being abandoned.  They are out there and will be updated over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turbo(s) are not being abandoned.  They are out there and will be updated over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
