Comments on: CodeGear - JBuilder 2007 announcement… http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007 David Intersimone (David I) CodeGear blog about programming, languages, history, and more. Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:47:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1 By: David Intersimone http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-877 David Intersimone Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:29:50 +0000 http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-877 > If there's a roadmap for other platforms <br> <br>Will get back to everyone on what platforms you can run JBuilder 2007 IDE. We've currently certified and delivered the install for Windows. Of course all of the things you build can run wherever Java runs. <br> > If there’s a roadmap for other platforms

Will get back to everyone on what platforms you can run JBuilder 2007 IDE. We’ve currently certified and delivered the install for Windows. Of course all of the things you build can run wherever Java runs.

]]> By: Mark Damon Hughes http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-876 Mark Damon Hughes Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:53:34 +0000 http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-876 There's no mention, anywhere, on the Borland site of operating systems other than Windows. This is bizarre, since Eclipse and SWT are cross-platform and presumably build on every major OS, so JBuilder 2007 should, also. <br> <br>I'm a fairly typical experienced Java developer: I've used a Windows machine for development twice in the last 10 years, and resented it both times. JBuilder was there to help me out the last time. But where are you now? <br> <br>If there's a roadmap for other platforms, it should be presented front and center on every FAQ and press release, because serious developers will be looking for that. <br> <br>This is really quite disappointing. For now, it looks like I continue using Eclipse + MyEclipse, rather than JBuilder, because it runs just fine on my Mac. <br> There’s no mention, anywhere, on the Borland site of operating systems other than Windows. This is bizarre, since Eclipse and SWT are cross-platform and presumably build on every major OS, so JBuilder 2007 should, also.

I’m a fairly typical experienced Java developer: I’ve used a Windows machine for development twice in the last 10 years, and resented it both times. JBuilder was there to help me out the last time. But where are you now?

If there’s a roadmap for other platforms, it should be presented front and center on every FAQ and press release, because serious developers will be looking for that.

This is really quite disappointing. For now, it looks like I continue using Eclipse + MyEclipse, rather than JBuilder, because it runs just fine on my Mac.

]]> By: David Intersimone http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-370 David Intersimone Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:10:51 +0000 http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-370 > I have JBuilder 7 Pro. Can I get the upgrade price of $199 to JBuilder 2007 Developer? <br> <br>All JBuilder versions qualify for the upgrade pricing for all editions. The FAQ will be updated shortly. <br> <br>Thanks for your support. > I have JBuilder 7 Pro. Can I get the upgrade price of $199 to JBuilder 2007 Developer?

All JBuilder versions qualify for the upgrade pricing for all editions. The FAQ will be updated shortly.

Thanks for your support.

]]> By: Captain Jake http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-371 Captain Jake Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:23:49 +0000 http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-371 I have JBuilder 7 Pro. Can I get the upgrade price of $199 to JBuilder 2007 Developer? I have JBuilder 7 Pro. Can I get the upgrade price of $199 to JBuilder 2007 Developer?

]]> By: Captain Jake http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-875 Captain Jake Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:18:42 +0000 http://blogs.codegear.com/davidi/2006/11/28/30007#comment-875 Here's hoping that JBuilder 2007 makes a lot of money for CodeGear. Here’s hoping that JBuilder 2007 makes a lot of money for CodeGear.

]]>